Outdoor Program and Property Assessment
You Are Here : Home : About Us : Council Operations :
Oakland Office Assessment • Outdoor Program & Camp Property Assessment • Twin Canyon Update • Tents & Trails: Help the Camps You Love • 2010 Camp Property Survey Results • 2010 Service Unit Input • Usage & Cost Data • 2009 Outdoor Program Survey Results • Maps • Property Rental • Summer Camp • Work Parties$2.86 Million Conservation Easement Purchases by Sempervirens Fund Save Redwoods, Camps!
The Girl Scouts’ 100th anniversary celebration theme, “Forever Green,” now rings more true thanks to the purchase by Sempervirens Fund – a nonprofit land conservation organization – of conservation easements on two Girl Scout properties in the Santa Cruz Mountains that will protect redwood forests and habitat from subdivision, development, and commercial timber harvest while enabling Girl Scouts to continue camp operations on the properties.
On March 1, 2012, Sempervirens Fund purchased conservation easements in the amount of $2.86 million for two Girl Scout properties: the 270-acre Skylark Ranch near Año Nuevo and the 142-acre Camp Butano Creek near Pescadero.
A conservation easement is a legal agreement between a landowner and a land trust or government agency that permanently limits uses of the land in order to protect its conservation values. It allows landowners to continue to own and use their land and also sell it or pass it on to heirs. The easement remains in place even if the owner of the land changes, thus assuring that the resources on the land are protected in perpetuity.
Both properties have very high conservation resource values and contain large volumes of redwoods, including over 1,420 old-growth trees that will be permanently protected under this easement. The properties are located in high priority conservation areas, with streams and old-growth redwoods that provide habitat for the marbled murrelet, an endangered sea bird that nests in old-growth trees. Butano Creek, which runs along the Camp Butano property, is a designated critical habitat for the endangered central coast Steelhead trout, as is Skylark Ranch, which contains part of the headwaters of Whitehouse Creek.
The conservation easements will ensure permanent protection of the forests and other natural resources on the properties by stripping the properties of their development rights while at the same time allowing Girl Scouts to retain ownership of the land, fund the upgrades and maintenance of camp facilities, and continue camp operations.
Click here for a map that shows how this conservation easement purchase will add 412 acres onto an expansive network of connected protected lands that total 34,000 acres. Camp Butano Creek adjoins Butano State Park on two sides and shares a third side with a property already protected with a conservation easement. Skylark Ranch shares its western border with Año Nuevo State Reserve and is only 500 feet from directly adjoining with Big Basin Redwoods State Park. More ...
Girl Scouts NorCal Properties 
Girl Scouts of Northern California operates 29 properties: 6 offices (staff, retail shops and meeting space); 2 service centers (staff, meeting space and no retail shop); 9 program centers (meeting/program space only) and 12 camp/outdoor program properties.
Click here for a map that shows the location of each property.
Oakland Office Assessment
The council’s Oakland office includes many of the council's headquarters functions and also includes a retail shop, museum and meeting areas. The Oakland office lease expires in 2013. During March and April 2011, GSNorCal adult members were invited to participate in a survey to give input regarding what’s important to them about a Girl Scout office/service center. 1,106 members participated in the survey, and their responses will help GSNorCal develop a plan for the 2013 expiration of the Oakland office lease. Click here to see results from the survey, and click here for a summary of these results.
Outdoor Program and Camp Property Assessment
In the summer of 2009, the Property Task Group toured camp properties, conducted a member survey about outdoor program and conducted girl focus groups at 4 camps: Deer Lake, Sugar Pine family camp, Hidden Falls and Skylark Ranch.
Information about this Outdoor Program and Property Assessment has been shared with members through email updates in "Notes from the CEO" (click here to subscribe). This page contains additional information for those interested in getting a more in-depth look at this process.
In August 2011, the Property Task Group shared an update with preliminary recommendations for member input via email and at September town hall meetings. The Property Task Group recommendations are aligned with the proposed 2012-2014 Strategic Plan – a link to the Strategic Plan Update also is included below:
- August 2011 Property Task Group Update
- 2012-2014 Strategic Plan Update
- September Delegate Meeting Schedule
Message from Marina Park, GSNorCal CEO, Regarding Twin Canyon
Background: In September 2011, I shared with members the Property Task Group’s draft recommendations for Girl Scouts of Northern California’s camp properties, and Michelle McCormick (Chief Program and Membership Officer) and I met with members in Walnut Creek on September 21, to discuss the Task Group’s recommendations.
The Task Group’s initial recommendation included Twin Canyon in the group of Tier 3 camps – camps at risk of sale or mothballing if we are not able to reduce losses on the Tier 1 and Tier 2 camps. Tier 1 camps are the three most used residential camps: Bothin, Butano and Skylark. Tier 2 camps are the camps the Task Group thinks we have a realistic opportunity to get to a break even operation: Deer Lake, Two Sentinels and Sugar Pine.
Since the Task Group’s preliminary recommendation, we heard from many members who would like to work with us to get Twin Canyon to a break even operation. As a result, at the November 5 Board meeting the Task Group recommended, and the Board agreed, that Twin Canyon be moved to the Tier 2 category. Our goal is to work with members during the 2012 fiscal year – now through September 2012 – to develop a realistic plan to get Twin Canyon to a break even operation. We also are continuing our work to reduce losses on the Tier 1 camps – and have made progress towards that goal this fall, with the dedication of a new donated adventure course at Bothin and a $1 million grant from the S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation to support our camp improvement plan (to increase capacity and sustainability) at Camp Butano Creek in the Santa Cruz Mountains.
January 18 Twin Canyon meeting topics:
- We answered questions about and developed a list of further information members would like to have. You can click this link for information that responds to the question: Why does Girl Scouts of Northern California need to reduce its losses on camp properties?
- We shared information and exchanged ideas about different “levers” we can use to get Twin Canyon to a break even operation. These included:
- A fee increase paid by Diablo Day Camp participants – The Day Camp committee is exploring this
- Increase membership, family giving and / or cookie sales: Currently, there are about 11,000 girl members in Service Units that are the primary users of Twin Canyon. These charts show the impact of achieving council averages for the cookie, fall sale and family giving in these Service Units and the impact of membership growth assuming that girls’ rate of participation in product sales and family giving remains the same
- Establish a reserve goal – We can explore ways to include Twin Canyon as part of the 5 year 100th Anniversary Campaign. A $1 million Twin Canyon fund, would for example, generate about $40,000 per year for Twin Canyon (using a 4% spending rate) – that would be one way to build a secure future for the camp. This would, however, require a significant effort by members willing to work with us on a campaign.
- Explore a conservation easement on the property
- Next steps: A broad community of members uses Twin Canyon in different ways – school year troops, service units and summer day camp. What is the best way to collaborate to make sure we can get things done and develop a plan the community supports?
Tents & Trails: Your camp memories may last forever, but our sites need your help.
The reality of bringing camp magic to you translates into loads of behind-the-scenes labor to keep our sites maintained and repaired. The very thing that draws you to our camp properties - that remote beauty, the sense of escape into nature - means we have to work extra hard to keep up with the toll that Mother Nature takes on our constantly-aging properties. Help keep our campfires burning for years to come.
Click here to donate, and if you'd like to lend your skills to volunteer to help at our sites, email camppropertyvolunteer@girlscoutsnorcal.org. Click here to learn more.
2010 Camp Property Survey
This survey focused on camp properties (as distinct from programs, which we explored in the survey described below). 658 members started this Survey and 554 members completed this Survey, which GSNorCal conducted from March 16 – April 15, 2010. Survey participants offered lots of ideas about ways to increase resources needed support to camp properties and outdoor program experiences. The Survey also provides helpful information about members’ views on future trends, factors that are most relevant in evaluating different camp properties and priorities for resources generated from camp properties.
Downloadable summary of survey results (data only)
Link to complete results, including all comments
2010 Service Unit Input on Vision and Goals
As part of the Outdoor Program and Property Assessment process, Regional Delegates were asked to discuss a few key questions with members regarding the role that outdoor programs and camp properties play in supporting the Council’s Mission and Vision. Below are the responses received by the Property Task Group representing various Service Units. This input will inform what our Council’s vision and goals will be for outdoor program and property and will set the stage for the next level of discussion regarding the future of our outdoor programs and camp properties.
- Vacaville (SU 206)
- Diablo Shadows (SU 321)
- Diablo Shadows (SU 321) (additional)
- East Contra Costa (SU 322)
- Creekside (SU 324)
- Orinda/Moraga (SU 327)
- Richardson Bay (SU 342)
- Marin Del Centro (SU 345)
- Mission Rafael (SU 346)
- Mission Rafel (SU 346) (additional)
- Novato (SU 347)
- Palo Alto (SU 601)
- Evergreen (SU 602)
- Evergreen (SU 602) (additional)
- Los Altos (SU 608)
- Blossom Hill/Los Gatos (SU 610)
- Saratoga (SU 618)
- Alum Rock (SU 621)
- IBM/S San Jose (SU 623)
- Cupertino (SU 630)
- Willow Glen/Cambrian (SU 638)
- Downtown/W SJ/Campbell (SU 661)
Usage and Cost Data
Outdoor Program Survey Results Summary: Summer 2009
Respondents
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
|
Number |
183 |
575 |
280 |
|
Position |
Troop Helper 97% |
Troop Leader 74% |
|
|
Age Level |
Daisy 1% |
Daisy 7% |
Daisy 15% |
|
GS Exp. |
1-2 years |
1-2 years 25% |
|
|
Camping Exp. |
Family 76% |
Family 75% |
Family 89% |
|
GS Camp |
Day Camp 59% |
Day Camp 58% |
Day Camp 54% |
Reasons That Girls Do Not Attend Camp:
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
|
Too Busy |
37% |
26% |
62% |
|
Not Ready |
36% |
43% |
57% |
|
Too Expensive |
34% |
41% |
68% |
|
Friends Don’t Go |
25% |
29% |
64% |
|
Too Far Away |
18% |
17% |
24% |
|
Not Interested |
13% |
5% |
13% |
|
No Transportation |
8% |
4% |
16% |
|
Don’t Like Facilities |
6% |
4% |
4% |
|
Don’t Like Outdoors |
|
3% |
14% |
GSNorCal Camps Attended
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
|
Arequipa |
4% |
8% |
25% |
|
Bothin |
42% |
37% |
77% |
|
Butano Creek |
23% |
18% |
50% |
|
Deer Lake |
6% |
6% |
7% |
|
Hidden Falls |
26% |
16% |
42% |
|
Rainbow’s End (Camp Metro) |
16% |
10% |
27% |
|
Skylark Ranch |
48% |
31% |
48% |
|
Sugar Pine |
14% |
11% |
21% |
|
The Cove |
3% |
3% |
11% |
|
Twin Canyon |
21% |
21% |
48% |
|
Two Sentinels |
7% |
4% |
18% |
Ranking of Favorite Activities:
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
|
Outdoor Cooking |
1 |
5 |
1 |
|
Swimming in a Pool |
2 |
2 |
|
|
Creative Arts |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
Horseback Riding |
4 |
4 |
|
|
Winter Sports |
5 |
|
|
|
Performing Arts |
|
3 |
|
|
Canoeing, Kayaking, Sailing |
|
|
2 |
|
Hiking |
|
|
3 |
|
Adventure: Ropes, Climb |
|
|
4 |
Girls also “Really Like”: Hiking, Field Trips and Service Projects. Combining Favorite and Really Like activities, Field Trips come out on top for girls!
Ranking of "Don't Like" Activities:
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
|
Martial Arts |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Field Sports |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Orienteering |
3 |
|
|
|
White Water Rafting |
4 |
2 |
|
|
Court Games |
5 |
|
|
|
Health & Fitness |
|
4 |
3 |
|
Backpacking |
|
5 |
|
|
Indoor Recreation |
|
|
1 |
|
Sports on Wheels |
|
|
5 |
Ideal Length of Stay at Camp:
|
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
|
Day Camp |
1-2 days |
8% |
12% |
10% |
|
|
3-5 days |
66% |
67% |
77% |
|
|
2 weeks |
26% |
21% |
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resident Camp |
4 days |
27% |
41% |
17% |
|
|
7 days |
31% |
39% |
48% |
|
|
11 days |
16% |
10% |
11% |
|
|
2 weeks |
13% |
9% |
19% |
|
|
1 month |
14% |
2% |
4% |
Ranking of Most Important Factor in Selecting a Camp:
|
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Having Fun |
1 |
|
|
|
Activities |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
Making Friends |
3 |
|
|
|
Learning New Things |
4 |
|
|
|
Safety & Security |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Cost |
|
3 |
3 |
|
Type of Location |
|
4 |
2 |
Least important for girls: returning to same camp and distance from home.
Offer opportunities for girls to:
|
|
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Have Fun |
--- |
99% |
|
Make new friends |
68% |
84% |
|
Learn new skills |
77% |
79% |
|
Gain independence/self reliance |
86% |
93% |
|
Increase her self-esteem |
81% |
91% |
|
Learn to get along with others |
71% |
89% |
|
Improve teamwork skills |
73% |
85% |
|
Gain leadership skills |
77% |
81% |
|
Develop character |
75% |
85% |
|
Appreciate differences in others |
72% |
84% |
|
Learn ways to respect and care for the environment |
67% |
81% |
Would Pay on a Sliding Scale:
|
|
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Yes |
65% |
56% |
|
No |
35% |
44% |
Willing to Drive:
|
|
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
15-30 min. |
17% |
--- |
|
1 hour |
20% |
10% |
|
1-2 hours |
31% |
35% |
|
2-3 hours |
12% |
24% |
|
3-4 hours |
4% |
9% |
|
Don’t care |
14% |
22% |
Activity Schedule Preferred:
|
|
Girls |
Parents |
|
Half & Half |
59% |
62% |
|
Unit Stays Together |
42% |
31% |
|
Sign Up |
29% |
37% |
|
Drop In |
25% |
21% |
Sleeping accommodations Preferred:
|
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Cabins |
50% |
57% |
26% |
|
Dorms |
36% |
34% |
18% |
|
Platform Tents |
35% |
31% |
34% |
|
Camping Tents |
22% |
14% |
31% |
|
Teepees |
17% |
10% |
13% |
|
No Tents |
24% |
9% |
19% |
Bathrooms/Showers Preferred:
|
|
Girls |
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Central for Each Unit |
57% |
44% |
42% |
|
In Cabins |
46% |
47% |
29% |
|
Bathroom in Unit – no shower |
16% |
23% |
26% |
|
Central for Entire Camp |
14% |
9% |
17% |
Food Preparation Preferred:
|
|
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Cooking in Units - fire |
34% |
40% |
|
Cooking in Units - BBQ |
26% |
29% |
|
Use of a Basic Kitchen in Unit/Cabin |
27% |
21% |
|
Use of Full Service Kitchen and Dinning Hall |
32% |
24% |
|
Food Service Provided by Camp |
43% |
25% |
Provide camp sites for:
|
|
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Troop Camping |
70% |
81% |
|
Service Unit Camporee |
51% |
66% |
|
Day Camp |
66% |
62% |
|
Resident Camp |
67% |
74% |
|
Trainings |
33% |
38% |
|
Council Events |
33% |
36% |
|
Family Camp |
33% |
21% |
Deciding Factors When Renting a Site:
|
|
Volunteers |
|
Cost |
82% |
|
Location |
76% |
|
Distance |
70% |
|
Type |
63% |
|
Size |
57% |
|
Features |
45% |
Add to Camps:
|
|
Parents |
Volunteers |
|
Program Features |
68% |
55% |
|
Better Bathrooms |
51% |
34% |
|
Better Cooking Facilities |
39% |
33% |
|
Indoor Housing |
42% |
28% |
|
Cell Phone Coverage |
44% |
37% |
|
Wi-Fi |
13% |
10% |
|
Expand to Serve Large Groups |
26% |
31% |
Program Features mentioned in comments from girls included ropes courses, climbing walls, and archery ranges.











